4.2 Article

PALB2 mutations in familial breast and pancreatic cancer

期刊

FAMILIAL CANCER
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 225-231

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10689-011-9426-1

关键词

BRCA2; Breast cancer; PALB2; Pancreatic cancer

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  2. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center [CA 006516]
  3. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Breast SPORE [CA 089393]
  4. Mac-Donald Family Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PALB2 (Partner And Localizer of BRCA2) binds to and co-localizes with BRCA2 in DNA repair. Germline mutations in PALB2 have been identified in approximately 1-2% of familial breast cancer and 3-4% of familial pancreatic cancer cases. The goal of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of PALB2 mutations in women with breast cancer without BRCA1/2 mutations who also had a personal or family history of pancreatic cancer. PALB2 mutation analysis was performed in 94 non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients with a personal or family history of pancreatic cancer. Two truncating PALB2 mutations, c.3549C > CA and c.2962C > CT, were identified resulting in a mutation prevalence of 2.1%. The proband found to carry the c.3549C > CA PALB2 mutation had a mother diagnosed with both breast and pancreatic cancer; this relative was subsequently confirmed to carry the identical mutation. The proband with the c.2962C > CT mutation had a father and paternal aunt diagnosed with pancreatic cancer; neither relative was available for testing. Two novel PALB2 missense variants were also found, one of which was deemed potentially deleterious. The prevalence rate of PALB2 mutations in a non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer population specifically selected for a family history of pancreatic cancer does not appear to be significantly increased compared to that observed in other breast cancer populations studied thus far. Further evaluation is needed to determine the prevalence of PALB2 mutations and the clinical utility of such testing in those individuals affected with both breast and pancreatic cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据