4.3 Article

Hyper oxygen-permeable rigid contact lenses as an alternative for the treatment of pediatric aphakia

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31811eadaa

关键词

contact lenses; Menicon Z; pediatric aphakia

资金

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York
  2. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To establish the safety and efficacy of a hyper oxygen-permeable rigid contact lens material, Menicon Z, for the fitting of aphakic infant eyes. Methods. A prospective study was performed on 16 eyes of 10 newly aphakic infants. Aphakic fittings were performed postoperatively with the Dyna Z intralimbal design of lenses, made exclusively from Menicon Z material for this study. Examinations were performed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, during which the lenses were used on a 1-week extended-wear basis. The following outcome measures were evaluated at each visit: Fit Characteristics, Ocular Integrity, Usability, and Contact Lens Integrity. Results. When used for the treatment of pediatric aphakia, the Menicon Z material provided excellent Fit Characteristics, was not damaging to the ocular structures, was relatively easy to manipulate for caregivers, and maintained its integrity well throughout the course of the study. Because there were no observable increases in the rate of microbial infection during the course of the study, the hyper oxygen-permeable nature of the Menicon Z material seems to provide adequate corneal oxygenation for aphakic children when used on a 1-week extended-wear basis. Conclusions. The Menicon Z contact lens material provides a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of infants and children requiring aphakic correction. This hyper oxygen-permeable material offers sufficient corneal oxygenation at the lens powers and thicknesses demanded by newly aphakic eyes combined with a low risk for associated complications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据