4.6 Article

Retrospective case series on the long-term visual and intraocular pressure outcomes of phacomorphic glaucoma

期刊

EYE
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 1675-1680

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2010.108

关键词

phacomorphic glaucoma; visual acuity; intraocular pressure; long-term

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To analyse the long-term visual acuity (VA) and intraocular pressure (IOP) outcomes in phacomorphic glaucoma. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive, acute phacomorphic glaucoma cases from January 2000 to April 2009 was conducted at The Caritas Medical Centre in Hong Kong. All cases underwent cataract extraction after IOP control with medication and/or laser. Results During a 3.1 +/- 2.6-year follow-up, the mean visual improvement was 1.1 +/- 0.9 LogMAR units with improvements in 81.7% of cases. A shorter duration from symptoms to cataract extraction resulted in greater visual improvement (r(2) = 0.1, P = 0.001). In all, 80.5% of the cases had IOP <= 21 mm Hg without any glaucoma treatment; 19.5% required 1.6 +/- 0.7 glaucoma eye drops; and 3.7% required additional laser iridotomy or trabeculectomy for IOP control at 1.8 +/- 2.3 years. The vertical cup-disc ratio (VCDR) of the index eye was 0.6 +/- 0.3. Gonioscopy revealed an averaged Shaffer grading of 3.0 +/- 1.0 and 99 +/- 90 degrees of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS). The Humphrey automated perimetry mean deviation was 5.2 +/- 2.7 and the pattern standard deviation was -15.9 +/- 10. Conclusion Over 80% of phacomorphic patients had long-term visual improvements and normalization of IOP after cataract extraction. A shorter attack seemed to offer better VA. Post-operatively, most have open angles with some degree of PAS formation, and glaucomatous optic neuropathy is evident from enlarged VCDRs and visual field defects. At least 2 years of follow-up is useful to detect a 20% glaucoma progression possibly requiring additional glaucoma treatments. Eye (2010) 24, 1675-1680; doi: 10.1038/eye.2010.108; published online 6 August 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据