4.6 Article

Laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy and quantitative aesthesiometry reveal decreased corneal innervation and sensation in keratoconus

期刊

EYE
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 586-592

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.52

关键词

cornea; keratoconus; in vivo confocal microscopy; epithelium; nerves; sensation

资金

  1. Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyse laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy images of the corneal epithelium and sub-basal nerve plexus in patients with keratoconus and to correlate these microstructural observations with corneal sensitivity. Methods A total of 31 eyes of 31 normal human subjects, and 27 eyes of 27 subjects with an established diagnosis of keratoconus were recruited. Twelve subjects with keratoconus had never worn contact lenses (K-NCL). Fifteen subjects with keratoconus wore contact lenses routinely (K-CL). All eyes were examined using slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Orbscan topography, non-contact corneal aesthesiometry, and laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy. Results Central corneal sensation was significantly lower in K-CL compared to normal (P = 0.028). However, there was no significant difference in corneal sensation between the normal and K-NCL groups (P = 0.059). Both sub-basal nerve density (P < 0.001) and basal epithelial density (P < 0.001) were significantly lower than normal in all keratoconic subjects. Central corneal sensation was only significantly correlated with sub-basal nerve density (P = 0.001) and was not significantly correlated with any of the basal epithelial parameters. Sub-basal nerve density showed significant positive correlation with basal epithelial density (P < 0.001). Conclusion This quantitative study reveals decreased corneal innervation, sensation, and basal epithelial density in keratoconus. The results of this study provide strong evidence that both the sub-basal nerves and the basal epithelium may be involved in the pathogenesis of keratoconus, although it is uncertain whether these are primary or secondary changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据