4.7 Article

A note on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 39, 期 7, 页码 6454-6457

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.062

关键词

Generalized fuzzy numbers; Ranking fuzzy numbers; Modification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60874105, 61174022]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-08-0345]
  3. Chongqing Natural Science Foundation [CSCT, 2010BA2003]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2010C030, XDJK2011D002]
  5. Southwest University Scientific & Technological Innovation Fund for Postgraduates [ky2011011]
  6. Southwest University [SWU110021]
  7. Hangzhou Key Lab of E-Business and Information Security, Hangzhou Normal University [HZEB201001]
  8. Key Subject Laboratory of National defense for Radioactive Waste and Environmental Security [10zxnk08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ranking fuzzy numbers plays an important role in decision making under uncertain environment. Recently, Chen and Sanguansat (2011) [Chen, S. M. & Sanguansat, K. (2011). Analyzing fuzzy risk based on a new fuzzy ranking method between generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), (pp. 2163-2171)] proposed a method for ranking generalized fuzzy numbers. It considers the areas on the positive side, the areas on the negative side and the heights of the generalized fuzzy numbers to evaluate ranking scores of the generalized fuzzy numbers. Chen and Sanguansat's method (2011) can overcome the drawbacks of some existing methods for ranking generalized fuzzy numbers. However. in the situation when the score is zero, the results of the Chen and Sanguansat's ranking method (2011) ranking method are unreasonable. The aim of this short note is to give a modification on Chen and Sanguansat's method (2011) to make the method more reasonable. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据