4.7 Article

Improved binary particle swarm optimization using catfish effect for feature selection

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 38, 期 10, 页码 12699-12707

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.057

关键词

Feature selection; Catfish binary particle swarm optimization; K-nearest neighbor; Leave-one-out cross-validation

资金

  1. National Science Council in Taiwan [NCS97-2622-E-151-008-CC2, NCS96-2221-E-214-050-MY3, NSC96-2622-E-151-019-CC3, NSC96-2622-E-214-004-CC3, NSC95-2221-E-151-004-MY3, NSC95-2221-E-214-087, NSC95-2622-E-214-004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feature selection process constitutes a commonly encountered problem of global combinatorial optimization. This process reduces the number of features by removing irrelevant, noisy, and redundant data, thus resulting in acceptable classification accuracy. Feature selection is a preprocessing technique with great importance in the fields of data analysis and information retrieval processing, pattern classification, and data mining applications. This paper presents a novel optimization algorithm called catfish binary particle swarm optimization (CatfishBPSO), in which the so-called catfish effect is applied to improve the performance of binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO). This effect is the result of the introduction of new particles into the search space (catfish particles), which replace particles with the worst fitness by the initialized at extreme points of the search space when the fitness of the global best particle has not improved for a number of consecutive iterations. In this study, the K-nearest neighbor (K-NN) method with leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) was used to evaluate the quality of the solutions. CatfishBPSO was applied and compared to 10 classification problems taken from the literature. Experimental results show that CatfishBPSO simplifies the feature selection process effectively, and either obtains higher classification accuracy or uses fewer features than other feature selection methods. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据