4.6 Review

Review-Development of Advanced Rechargeable Batteries: A Continuous Challenge in the Choice of Suitable Electrolyte Solutions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 162, 期 14, 页码 A2424-A2438

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0051514jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [1469/13]
  2. Ethel and David Resnick Chair in Active Oxygen Chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-aqueous, rechargeable battery development is one of the most important challenges of modem electrochemistry. Li ion batteries are a commercial-reality for portable electronics with intensive efforts underway to apply this technology to electro-mobility. Extensive investigations of high energy density Li-sulfur and Li-oxygen systems have also been carried-out. Efforts to promote high energy density power sources for electric vehicles have been accompanied by intensive work on the development of rechargeable sodium and magnesium batteries for load-leveling applications. The electrolyte solution is a key consideration in all batteries determining cell stability, cycle life, and safety. This review discusses the importance of solution selection for advanced, high-voltage, Li ion batteries, sodium ion batteries, as well as Li-sulfur, Li-oxygen and magnesium batteries. Li ion battery standard solutions are discussed and their further optimization is outlined. Limitations of Li metal electrodes are explained. Unique problems in the use of conventional non-aqueous solutions for Li-oxygen batteries, related to intrinsic stability, are delineated. Finally, electrolyte solutions for Mg batteries are briefly reviewed, concluding that only the relatively inert ethereal solutions are suitable for future consideration. Several systems exhibit wide electrochemical windows and reversible behavior with Mg anodes, however compatibility with high-voltage/high-capacity cathodes remains a major challenge. (C) 2015 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据