4.7 Article

Use of hybrid multiple uncertain attribute decision making techniques in safety management

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 1569-1586

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.054

关键词

MAUT; TOPSIS; BNs; Fuzzy logic; Entropy measures; Safety management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effective safety management often requires identifying the optimal risk control option (RCO) based oil multiple uncertain attributes. While traditional utility theory based techniques such its multiple attribute utility technique (MAUT) have been generated to deal with the multiplicity of the attributes. many problems regarding their uncertainty are observed, but not well addressed. In this paper, it new hybrid methodology is developed to explain the role of Bayesian Networks (BABY) in MA UT ill it complementary way, in which all relevant decision attributes in the form of the nodes in BNs will produce certain associated attribute values expressed by posterior probabilities. which can be used and combined in a traditional MAUT framework (i.e., TOPSIS) its a parameter to rank a set of options. Furthermore. the paper proposes a novel utility function, which can appropriately represent the risk results produced above (additive or non-additive and linguistic or numerical) and avoid the arguments resulting from exclusive states expressed by linguistic variables with fuzzy nature and the ignorance/incomplete representation of context dependency between decision attributes. Fuzzy logic is then used to take into account crisp values, fuzzy numbers and linguistic variables that are common phenomena in a risk based decision problem and entropy measures are used to model the unpredictability of the relative weights of decision attributes in a dynamic networking environment. Finally the proposed methodology is illustrated using it container transportation delay related case study. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据