4.7 Article

Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 9891-9898

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.073

关键词

DEMATEL; Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM); Entropy; Maximum mean de-entropy (MMDE) algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To deal with complex problems, structuring them through graphical representations and analyzing causal influences can aid in illuminating complex issues, systems, or concepts. The DEMATEL method is a methodology which can confirm interdependence among variables and aid in tire development of a chart to reflect interrelationships between variables, and can be used for researching and solving complicated and intertwined problem groups. The end product of the DEMATEL process is a visual representation-the impact-relations map-by which respondents organize their own actions in the world. In order to obtain a suitable impact-relations map, an appropriate threshold value is needed to obtain adequate information for further analysis and decision-making. In the existing literature, the threshold value has been determined through interviews with respondents or judged by the researcher. In most cases, it is hard and time-consuming to aggregate the respondents and make a consistent decision. In addition, in order to avoid subjective judgments, a theoretical method to select the threshold value is necessary. In this paper, we propose a method based on the entropy approach, the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm, to achieve this purpose. Using a real case to find the interrelationships between the services of a Semiconductor Intellectual Property Mall as an example, we will compare the results obtained from the respondents and from our method, and show that the impact-relations maps from these two methods could be the same. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据