4.2 Review

Quantitative phosphoproteomics strategies for understanding protein kinase-mediated signal transduction pathways

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF PROTEOMICS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 81-94

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/EPR.10.104

关键词

2D-DIGE; cell signaling; iTRAQ/TMT; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; phosphoproteomics; phosphorylation; prefractionation; protein kinase; SILAC; two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [20570177]
  2. Nagase Science and Technology Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20570177] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein phosphorylation is a central regulatory mechanism of cell signaling pathways. This highly controlled biochemical process is involved in most cellular functions, and defects in protein kinases and phosphatases have been implicated in many diseases, highlighting the importance of understanding phosphorylation-mediated signaling networks. However, phosphorylation is a transient modification, and phosphorylated proteins are often less abundant. Therefore, the large-scale identification and quantification of phosphoproteins and their phosphorylation sites under different conditions are one of the most interesting and challenging tasks in the field of proteomics. Both 2D gel electrophoresis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry serve as key phosphoproteomic technologies in combination with prefractionation, such as enrichment of phosphorylated proteins/peptides. Recently, new possibilities for quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis have been offered by technical advances in sample preparation, enrichment, separation, instrumentation, quantification and informatics. In this article, we present an overview of several strategies for quantitative phosphoproteomics and discuss how phosphoproteomic analysis can help to elucidate signaling pathways that regulate various cellular processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据