4.1 Review

Do we need more than one antidepressant for patients with major depressive disorder?

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 1561-1564

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/ERN.11.150

关键词

antidepressant; combination; evidence; guideline; major depressive disorder; monotherapy

资金

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A102065]
  2. GlaxoSmithKline Korea
  3. GlaxoSmithKline USA
  4. AstraZeneca Korea
  5. Janssen Pharmaceuticals Korea
  6. McNeil Consumer and Specialty Inc.
  7. Forest Lab
  8. Johnson and Johnson, Inc.
  9. Eli Lilly and Company Korea
  10. Korean Research Foundation
  11. Korea Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  12. Wyeth Korea
  13. Korean Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning
  14. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
  15. Sanofi-Aventis Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to currently existing treatment guidelines, when a single antidepressant medication is not working, the common next step treatment is to switch to another class of antidepressants or to add another one to the first therapeutic agent. With regard to this issue, combination therapy has been suggested to provide unexpected synergy for patients, resulting in more remission compared with switching strategies, although some debates are still ongoing. Recently, Rush and colleagues have investigated whether two antidepressant combination treatments should produce a higher remission rate in first-step acute-phase (12 weeks) and long-term (7 months) treatment compared with monotherpay. They failed to find any superiority of combination treatment over monotherapy in terms of efficacy and safety. The remission and response rates and most secondary outcomes were not different among treatment groups at 12 weeks and 7 months, while the mean number of worsening adverse events was higher for combination treatment (5.7) than for monotherapy (4.7) at 12 weeks. This article will discuss the clinical and further research implications in the context of the potential limitations and significance of this recent study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据