4.3 Review

Scientific evidence for the use of modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 219-239

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/ERD.09.65

关键词

computer assisted; high tibial osteotomy; knee; minimally invasive; outcome; prosthesis; total hip arthroplasty; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

资金

  1. Biomet
  2. DePuy
  3. Smith Nephew
  4. Stryker
  5. Wright Medical Finsbury
  6. BrainLab
  7. Salient

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as a surgical treatment for monocompartmental knee arthritis remains a controversial procedure with questions surrounding the benefits and survivorship of the procedure versus osteotomies or total knee arthroplasties. The authors, by examining the complete body of literature for scientific evidence concerning the procedure, will describe the history of usage of these prostheses, their rationale for usage, modern devices and their results, and why they may have advantages as a treatment modality for monocompartmental knee arthritis. Outcomes of current unicompartmental designs will be presented and evaluated to determine which aspects of the design and patient selection technique are associated with success or failure. Commonly asked questions regarding the use of these devices will be addressed. The authors will also describe some potential modifications that might affect the use of these components in the future, including minimally invasive procedures and robotics, and how these devices may change over the next 5 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据