4.6 Article

Reduced Order Modeling of Mechanical Degradation Induced Performance Decay in Lithium-Ion Battery Porous Electrodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 162, 期 9, 页码 A1751-A1771

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0241509jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1438431]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Vehicles Technology Office
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1438431] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A one-dimensional computational framework is developed that can solve for the evolution of voltage and current in a lithium-ion battery electrode under different operating conditions. A reduced order model is specifically constructed to predict the growth of mechanical degradation within the active particles of the carbon anode as a function of particle size and C-rate. Using an effective diffusivity relation, the impact of microcracks on the diffusivity of the active particles has been captured. Reduction in capacity due to formation of microcracks within the negative electrode under different operating conditions (constant current discharge and constant current constant voltage charge) has been investigated. At the beginning of constant current discharge, mechanical damage to electrode particles predominantly occurs near the separator. As the reaction front shifts, mechanical damage spreads across the thickness of the negative electrode and becomes relatively uniform under multiple discharge/charge cycles. Mechanical degradation under different drive cycle conditions has been explored. It is observed that electrodes with larger particle sizes are prone to capacity fade due to microcrack formation. Under drive cycle conditions, small particles close to-the separator and large particles close to the current collector can help in reducing the capacity fade due to mechanical degradation. (C) The Author(s) 2015. Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据