4.5 Review

Will new antimicrobials overcome resistance among Gram-negatives?

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 909-922

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/ERI.11.107

关键词

ESBL; ESCAPE; MBL; new anti-Gram-negative compounds; new classes of antimicrobials

资金

  1. Pfizer Inc.
  2. Merck Serono
  3. Novartis
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
  6. Sanofi-Aventis
  7. Cephalon, Inc.
  8. Bayer Schering Pharma
  9. Janssen
  10. Astellas Pharma Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spread of resistance among Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria represents a growing challenge for the development of new antimicrobials. The pace of antibiotic drug development has slowed during the last decade and, especially for Gram-negatives, clinicians are facing a dramatic shortage in the availability of therapeutic options to face the emergency of the resistance problem throughout the world. In this alarming scenario, although there is a shortage of compounds reaching the market in the near future, antibiotic discovery remains one of the keys to successfully stem and maybe overcome the tide of resistance. Analogs of already known compounds and new agents belonging to completely new classes of antimicrobials are in early stages of development. Novel and promising anti-Gram-negative antimicrobials belong both to old (cephalosporins, carbapenems, beta-lactamase inhibitors, monobactams, aminoglycosides, polymyxin analogues and tetracycline) and completely new antibacterial classes (boron-containing antibacterial protein synthesis inhibitors, bis-indoles, outer membrane synthesis inhibitors, antibiotics targeting novel sites of the 50S ribosomal subunit and antimicrobial peptides). However, all of these compounds are still far from being introduced into clinical practice. Therefore, infection control policies and optimization in the use of already existing molecules are still the most effective approaches to reduce the spread of resistance and preserve the activity of antimicrobials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据