4.5 Review

Targeting the ATF4 pathway in cancer therapy

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC TARGETS
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 1189-1202

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1517/14728222.2012.728207

关键词

ATF4; eIF2 alpha; endoplasmic reticulum stress; GCN2; HRI; hypoxia; kinase inhibitors; PERK; PKR; unfolded protein response

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK
  2. European Commission (Metoxia) [222741]
  3. Cancer Research UK [11359] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10163] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) is a member of the activating transcription factor family. ATF4 expression is increased in response to a diverse array of microenvironmental stresses including amino acid depletion, oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress that are sensed by upstream eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2 alpha) kinases. In tumours, ATF4 expression is detected in hypoxic- and nutrient-deprived regions where it promotes metabolic homeostasis and cancer cell survival by transcriptionally regulating amino acid uptake and biosynthesis, autophagy, redox balance and angiogenesis. Areas covered: The mechanism governing translational expression of ATF4 is discussed along with the physiological roles of ATF4 in growth and development. Conditions that result in ATF4 expression in tumours are described with a focus on the role of ATF4 in cancer progression and treatment resistance. Several approaches to target ATF4 are presented including strategies aimed at inhibiting transcriptional activity or increasing degradation, approaches to reduce ATF4 translation by inhibiting upstream eIF2 alpha kinases and targeting of downstream pathways that are regulated by ATF4 including amino acid biosynthesis, ER-associated degradation and autophagy. Expert opinion: The authors provide a number of suggestions that may assist in the development of ATF4 inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据