4.5 Article

Correlation between plasma levels of apelin and myocardial hypertrophy in rats and humans: possible target for treatment?

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC TARGETS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 231-241

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14728220903485685

关键词

-

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [PIC/IC/82943/2007]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PIC/IC/82943/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the effects of left ventricular (LV) pressure overload and diabetes on the apelinergic system. Research design/methods: Pressure overload was established in rats by supra-renal aortic-banding. Six weeks later, diabetes was induced by streptozotocin (65 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), resulting in four groups: sham, banded (BA), diabetic (DM) and diabetic-banded (DM-BA). Twelve weeks later, LV function and structure were evaluated by echocardiography and biopsies and plasma samples collected. Furthermore, plasma samples and LV-endomyocardial biopsies were procured from aortic stenosis and mitral stenosis patients during surgery to evaluate myocardial expression of apelin and APJ-receptor and plasma levels of apelin. Results: Direct correlations between apelin plasma levels and LV-mass index and between apelin and APJ myocardial expression were observed both in humans and rats. Expression of apelin and APJ was not significantly altered by pressure-overload in humans, being downregulated by pressure overload and even more by diabetes in rats. Finally, an inverse correlation between apelin rat plasma levels and its myocardial expression was observed. Conclusions: While apelin/APJ myocardial expression decreases, apelin plasma levels increase in LV hypertrophy. Considering apelin's positive inotropic and vasodilator properties, this elevation in apelin plasma levels may represent a compensatory mechanism to maintain inotropism and cardiac output during pressure-overload or diabetic cardiomyopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据