4.4 Article

High neuroendocrine component is a factor for poor prognosis in gastrointestinal high-grade malignant mixed adenoneuroendocrine neoplasms

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 78, 期 8, 页码 454-459

出版社

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcma.2015.04.002

关键词

high-grade malignant mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma; neuroendocrine component; prognosis

资金

  1. Yen Tjing Ling Medical Foundation [CI-103-10]
  2. Taiwan Clinical Oncology Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: High-grade malignant mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) is a highly malignant combined neoplasm formed by an adenocarcinomatous component and a poorly differentiated (Grade 3) neuroendocrine (NE) carcinoma. Methods: Tumors from 21 patients with gastrointestinal high-grade malignant MANECs or tumors with varying percentages of Grade 3 NE component were examined, and the NE component was confirmed by morphological analysis and immunohistochemical staining. Patients were divided into high NE (NE component > 50% in the primary tumor) and low NE (NE component <= 50% in the primary tumor) component groups. Results: High NE component was a poor prognostic factor for patients with high grade MANEC (p = 0.021). Out of 13 patients with high-grade malignant MANEC, eight had a pure NE component, one had a pure adenocarcinomatous component, and four had mixed-type cancer in the metastatic lymph nodes. We further enrolled eight patients who had a Grade 3 NE component in the primary tumor and found that the pure NE component in tumor emboli and distant liver metastases were more frequent in the high NE than in the low NE component group (p = 0.012 and p = 0.046, respectively). Conclusion: The predominant tumor component in primary tumors was a prognostic factor and could predict tumor emboli and liver metastases pathology in high-grade malignant MANECs. Copyright (C) 2015 Elsevier Taiwan LLC and the Chinese Medical Association. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据