4.2 Review

Pharmacotherapy of the third-generation AEDs: lacosamide, retigabine and eslicarbazepine acetate

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 699-715

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2012.667803

关键词

adverse effect profiles; drug-drug interactions; efficacy profiles; eslicarbazepine acetate; lacosamide; novel mechanisms of action; pharmacokinetics; retigabine; therapeutic drug monitoring; third-generation antiepileptic drugs

资金

  1. Eisai
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Johnson and Johnson
  4. Novartis
  5. Pfizer
  6. Sanofi-Aventis
  7. UCB Pharma
  8. Department of Health's NIHR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The search for new, more effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) continues. The three most recently approved drugs, the so-called third-generation AEDs, include lacosamide, retigabine and eslicarbazepine acetate and are licensed as adjunctive treatment of partial epilepsy in adults. Areas covered: For the above three AEDs, their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic characteristics, drug-drug interactions, pharmacotherapeutics, dose and administration and therapeutic drug monitoring are reviewed in this paper. Expert opinion: Lacosamide and retigabine act through novel mechanisms, while eslicarbazepine acetate, a pro-drug for eslicarbazepine, acts in a similar manner to several other AEDs. All three AEDs are associated with linear pharmacokinetic and rapid absorption and undergo metabolism. Their drug-drug interaction profile is low (lacosamide and retigabine) to modest (eslicarbazepine) in propensity. At the highest approved doses for the three AEDs, responder rates were similar. The most commonly observed adverse effects compared with placebo were dizziness, headache, diplopia and nausea for lacosamide; dizziness, somnolence and fatigue for retigabine and dizziness and somnolence for eslicarbazepine acetate. The precise role that these new AEDs will have in the treatment of epilepsy and whether they will make a significant impact on the prognosis of intractable epilepsy is not yet known and will have to await further clinical experience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据