4.2 Review

Therapeutic options for Acinetobacter baumannii infections: an update

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 13, 期 16, 页码 2319-2336

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2012.729820

关键词

Acinetobacter baumannii; antimicrobial resistance; infections; treatment

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Health [FIS 11/02024]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR1256]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  4. European's Development Regional Fund 'A way to achieve Europe' ERDF
  5. Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases [REIPI RD06/0008]
  6. European Community [HEALTH-F3-2008-223031, HEALTH-F3-2008-223101, HEALTH-F3-2011-231.1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Although the clinical importance of Acinetobacter pittii and Acinetobacter nosocomialis has increased in the nosocomial setting in the last decade, infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii still have the highest clinical relevance. The most important features of this latter species are the ability to persist in the hospital environment and the multi-drug, extended-drug or pandrug resistance they may present which compromises the treatment of infections caused by this microorganism. Areas covered: In the present review, the authors describe the molecular bases of the acquisition of resistant mechanisms as well as different current and potential future strategies to treat infections caused by multi-drug resistant A. baumannii. Expert opinion: With the increase in resistance to carbapenems, colistin has been extensively used, however some data suggest that the doses recommended are insufficient before a steady state is reached, suggesting that the administration of a loading dose on initiation of treatment may be beneficial. Combinations of antibacterial agents such as impenem plus sulbactam or imipenem plus colistin have been successfully used to treat VAP. Nonetheless, future alternatives for treating A. baumannii infections should be explored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据