4.2 Review

QTc interval prolongation by d-propoxyphene: what about other analgesics?

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 1397-1409

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2012.682150

关键词

analgesics; hERG; non-opioids; opioids; QT interval

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: d-Propoxyphene, which was previously available in many single-agent and combination products, was recently voluntarily withdrawn from the US market following an FDA recommendation based partly on the concern that the risk associated with QT prolongation exceeded the clinical benefit of the drug. The drug had previously been withdrawn from European markets. These recent actions prompt the question: what is known about QT prolongation and analgesic drugs? Areas covered: A systematic search was conducted of 50 opioid and non-opioid analgesic drugs using PubMed, the FDA website, and the Internet. Search terms for opioids, NSAIDs, acetaminophen and other analgesics were used (including both generic and brand names), along with QTc, QTc prolongation, QTc interval, hERG, torsades de pointes (TdP), ventricular arrhythmias, and other relevant terms. Expert opinion: There is a paucity of available information on the QT interval for most analgesics. Of those for which there is a lot of data, only methadone, oxycodone, and LAAM (levo-acetylmethadol) appear to have a known and accepted level of effect on the QT interval.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据