4.2 Review Publication with Expression of Concern

Effect of telmisartan addition to amlodipine on ankle edema development in treating hypertensive patients (Publication with Expression of Concern. See vol. 19, 2018)

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 12, 期 16, 页码 2441-2448

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2011.623698

关键词

amlodipine; ankle edema; hypertension; telmisartan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of telmisartan addition to amlodipine, on peripheral edema in hypertensive patients. Research design and methods: Seventy-five outpatients were randomized to amlodipine (A) 10 mg or telmisartan (T) 80 mg, or amlodipine 10 mg plus telmisartan 80 mg, for 6 weeks, in three crossover periods. Main outcome measures: Blood pressure, ankle foot volume (AFV) and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure (PSTP) were evaluated, as were plasma norepinephrine and plasma active renin (PAR). Results: Amlodipine-telmisartan combination induced greater SBP/DBP reduction (-28.1/21.7 mmHg, p < 0.0001 vs baseline) compared with monotherapy with both amlodipine and telmisartan. Amlodipine monotherapy increased AFV by 26.7%, and PSTP by 83.2% (both p < 0.01). Adding telmisartan to amlodipine produced a significantly lesser increase in both AFV (+7.9%, p < 0.01 vs amlodipine) and PSTP (+23.8%, p < 0.01 vs amlodipine). Plasma norepinephrine levels were increased by amlodipine (+134.3 pg/ml, p < 0.01); such an increase was attenuated by the addition of telmisartan (+55 pg/ml, p < 0.05 vs amlodipine). PAR was slightly increased by amlodipine (+21.5 pg/ml, p < 0.05) and more by telmisartan alone (+62.5 pg/ml) and telmisartan-amlodipine combination (+71.3 pg/ml; both p < 0.01). Conclusions: The addition of telmisartan to amlodipine significantly attenuated amlodipine-induced edema formation. The reduction of amlodipine-induced reflex-sympathetic activation by telmisartan might have contributed to such an effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据