4.2 Review

Long-term experience with hylan GF-20 in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 1797-1804

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.9.10.1797

关键词

hyaluronan; hylan; knee; osteoarthritis; treatment viscosupplementation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Osteoarthritis is the most frequent musculoskeletal disease and a major cause of disability in the elderly. Knee osteoarthritis is the first cause of consultations for osteoarthritis-related symptoms. Its current management requires the combination of pharmaceutical and non-pharmacological strategies, including intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid that are aimed at decreasing pain and improving joint function by restoring joint homeostasis (viscosupplementation). Hylan GF-20 is a cross-linked hyaluronic acid derivative, FDA approved as a medical device since 1997 for the treatment of patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Objectives: This review aims to summarise recently published evidence and offer practical suggestions to clinical colleagues who are considering including viscosupplementation in their practices. Methods: The authors reviewed extensively the published papers on the topic, but selected only those that appeared to be the most relevant, on the mechanisms of action, efficacy and safety of the treatment, clinical predictors of response, ideal dosing regimen and differences between commercial preparations. They also give their own clinical experience with hylan GF-20 as a symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Conclusion: Data of the literature clearly demonstrate that hylan GF-20 is a safe and effective treatment for decreasing pain and improving function in patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. Its long-term (10 years) use allows knowing with accuracy the main indications, contraindications, side effects and prognostic factors of response, which are all extensively discussed throughout this review.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据