4.5 Article

Efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of alcohol and benzodiazepine dependence

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 1019-1029

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2012.685651

关键词

abuse potential; alcohol dependence; benzodiazepine dependence; efficacy; pregabalin; relapse prevention; safety; side effects; withdrawal syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Both alcohol and benzodiazepine dependence (AD, BD) are severe and chronic conditions with devastating physical and mental health effects. The relative scarcity and controversial evidential status of available pharmacological interventions for the treatment of patients' acute withdrawal syndrome and/or relapse prevention call for the clinical investigation of novel safe and efficacious agents. Areas covered: We review published studies of pregabalin as monotherapy in the treatment of AD and BD in more than 450 patients. Available evidence includes four RCTs, two in AD with active comparator drugs (naltrexone, tiapride, and lorazepam) and one placebo-controlled, and one placebo-controlled in BD. We also review other available studies on pregabalin's potential to reduce benzodiazepine consumption, its side effects, especially cognitive, as well as extant reports on its liability for abuse. Expert opinion: Available evidence suggests that monotherapy with pregabalin, within the dosage range of 150 - 600 mg/d, is a promising novel option for the safe and efficacious relapse prevention of both AD and BD. However, its efficacy as monotherapy in the acute treatment of AD withdrawal syndrome is still controversial. Clinicians should be cautious in prescribing pregabalin to patients with a history of multiple substance recreational use, and monitor its effects on cognition at dosages above 450 mg/d. Further, well-designed clinical research is still needed for the eventual consolidation of pregabalin's place in the treatment of AD and BD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据