4.5 Review

Triple reuptake inhibitors for treating subtypes of major depressive disorder: the monoamine hypothesis revisited

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1107-1130

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2011.594039

关键词

abuse potential; antidepressant; anhedonia; atypical; dopamine; glutamate; major depressive disorder; melancholic; monoamines; triple reuptake inhibitors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Major depression is one of the most prevalent forms of mental illnesses and is among the leading causes of disability, affecting about 121 million people worldwide. Approximately 30% of patients fail to respond to present therapies. Therefore, the search for novel antidepressant drugs continues. Areas covered: The most prescribed antidepressants are serotonin reuptake inhibitors and/or noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, which only indirectly affect dopaminergic neurotransmission. As a consequence, residual symptoms remain, including impaired motivation and impaired pleasure. This article reviews the development of new broad-spectrum antidepressants, the triple reuptake inhibitors, which also increase brain dopamine levels. Expert opinion: In this review, a distinction is made between the subtypes of melancholic and atypical depressions and their associated brain abnormalities and dysfunctions in neurotransmitter systems. Subsequently, we propose a hypothetical model: 'the monoamine hypothesis revisited' to predict what kind of pharmacological treatment will be effective in the different subtypes of depression. It is expected that the triple reuptake inhibitors, inhibiting the reuptake of all three monoamines, can produce a greater efficacy than traditional antidepressants especially in atypical depression. Since triple reuptake inhibitors may also dampen states of hyperglutamatergic activity and subsequent excitotoxicity, it is suggested that these new drugs have a considerable neuroprotective potential in major depression, especially in melancholic depression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据