4.5 Review

Targeting cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: a review of the development of a new class of medicines from the perspective of community mental health researchers

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.2012.634798

关键词

clinical trials; cognitive deficits; cognitive-enhancing agents; schizophrenia

资金

  1. Abbott Laboratories
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  4. Cephalon
  5. Eli Lilly and Co.
  6. Lundbeck
  7. Otsuka
  8. National Institute of Health/National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  9. Novartis
  10. sanofi-aventis
  11. Shires
  12. UBC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Schizophrenia is a chronic disorder associated with positive and negative symptoms and wide-ranging deficits in neurocognitive function. Neurocognitive deficits are considered to be the core pathophysiological symptoms of the illness. Neurocognitive deficits are also closely associated with functional outcome. At present, cognitive deficits remain one of the most important unmet therapeutic needs in schizophrenia. Areas covered: Neuroscientific discoveries over the past decades have enriched our understanding of the neurobiological mechanism underlying cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. This research has identified new molecular mechanisms and processes as promising pharmacological targets. However, in spite of extensive efforts to develop a new class of cognitive-enhancing medicines for the treatment of schizophrenia over the past 5 years, no novel pharmacological agents have received the regulatory approvals required by the Food and Drug Administration. The efficacy and safety outcomes from selective Phase II clinical trials are reviewed. Expert opinion: The evolving concept of neurocognition and the current guidelines for the design and methodology of clinical trials of cognitive-enhancing drugs for the treatment of individuals with schizophrenia are critically examined. The future directions in the development of cognitive-enhancing medicines for the treatment of schizophrenia from the perspective of clinicians and researchers from community mental health settings are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据