4.2 Review

Emerging drugs for biliary cancer

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON EMERGING DRUGS
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 11-24

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14728214.2014.870553

关键词

biliary cancer; chemotherapy; cholangiocarcinoma; molecular-targeted drugs

资金

  1. Lilly
  2. Taiho Pharmaceutical
  3. AstraZeneka
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Merck Serono
  6. Novartis
  7. Bayer
  8. Pfizer
  9. OncoTherapyScience
  10. Kowa
  11. Otsuka Pharmaceutical
  12. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma
  13. Ono pharmaceutical, Yakult
  14. Eisai
  15. Kyowa Hakko Kirin
  16. Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma
  17. Chugai
  18. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The number of biliary cancer patients is small and it is often complicated by serious adverse events making it difficult for clinical studies to be performed on this cancer. However, researches for clarification of the mechanisms of onset and proliferation of biliary cancer and of the effects of drugs suppressing these mechanisms have been initiated recently, with the goal of establishing effective treatments. Areas covered: This review will cover epidemiological and biological features of biliary cancer, the efficacy and limitations of the existing methods of treatment, and current goals for the development of new treatment methods. Furthermore, the findings of pre-clinical studies on promising treatment targets and ongoing clinical studies are also reviewed, and perspectives for the future of treatment are discussed. Expert opinion: Following the recent increase in the interest in drug development, attempts at clarifying the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset and proliferation have been made proactively, accompanied by clinical studies on various molecular-targeted drugs for the treatment of this cancer. To demonstrate the efficacy of these drugs, it is essential to establish a system for efficient screening of patients carrying the molecular targets and to devise an excellent clinical study design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据