4.3 Review

Potential side effects to GLP-1 agonists: understanding their safety and tolerability

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 207-218

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2015.987122

关键词

cancer risk; GLP-1 receptor agonists; incretin-based therapy; side effects

资金

  1. Astra Zeneca
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim
  4. Ely Lilly
  5. Merck Sharp Dohme
  6. Novartis
  7. Novo Nordisk
  8. Sanofi- Aventis
  9. Takeda

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1Rx) agonists might elicit unwelcome side effects and concerns have recently been raised about their safety. Areas covered: Available evidence about safety, tolerability and potential adverse events relative to GLP-1Rx agonists presently used. We searched the MEDLINE database using the terms: 'GLP-1 receptor agonists', 'Incretin therapy side effects', 'exenatide', 'liraglutide', 'exenatide long-acting release', ' lixisenatide'. Articles were selected on the basis of the study design and importance, in the light of authors' clinical experience and personal judgment. The main safety concern about GLP-1Rx agonists use is the possible association with increased risk of pancreatitis and/or tumors. This concern stems mainly from limited observations in animal models not confirmed in similar studies. Furthermore, clinical studies reporting association between GLP-1Rx agonist use and pancreatitis/cancer are marred by several biases and both clinical trials and post-marketing analyses failed to demonstrate a significant association. Expert opinion: As stated by both FDA and EMA, the safety concerns emerged so far about GLP-1RX agonists should not affect present prescribing habits. Thus, although a strict data monitoring must be encouraged, they should not prevent access to the benefits of an innovative treatment, such as GLP-1Rx agonists use, to a large diabetic population still confronted with unmet needs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据