4.5 Review

Designing drugs with multi-target activity: the next step in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 115-129

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2013.744746

关键词

designed multiple ligands; multifunctional drugs; neurodegenerative diseases; scaffold

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Neurodegenerative diseases have had devastating effects on patients' quality of life. These complex diseases have several pathways that are affected to initiate cell death. Current therapies, designed to address only a single target, fall short in mitigating or preventing disease progression, and disease-modifying drugs are desperately needed. Over the past several years, a new paradigm has emerged which has as a goal the targeting of multiple disease etiological pathways. Such multi-targeted designed drugs (MTDD) have shown great promise in preclinical studies as neuroprotective agents, as well as being able to afford symptomatic relief to blunt the day-to-day burden of these illnesses. Areas covered: In this review, the authors evaluate the use of chemical scaffolds that led themselves exquisitely to the development of MTDDs in central nervous system disorders. Some of the examples discussed have also transitioned into the clinic, which underscores the importance of pursuing drug discovery programs within the multifunctional arena. Expert opinion: Currently, very little can be done to slow the progress of neurodegeneration. The multifaceted profile of neurodegeneration necessitates a change in paradigm toward the design of compounds that address several drug targets simultaneously. With successful compounds in clinical trials as well as compounds moving into the clinic, support is growing and the feasibility of this approach is now becoming recognized. This review shows that several small molecule scaffolds can be successfully utilized to design MTDD compounds with good CNS pharmacokinetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据