4.5 Review

Ariadne's ChemEffect and Pathway Studio knowledge base

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY
卷 4, 期 12, 页码 1307-1318

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17460440903413488

关键词

cholestasis; glioblastoma; information extraction; MedScan; natural language processing; systems biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Importance of the field: Drug discovery and development is a very complex and costly process. Understanding the detailed molecular mechanisms of a disease and drug actions can make it more efficient not only for new target discovery but also for lead prioritization, drug repositioning and development of biomarkers for drug efficacy and safety. Access to formalized knowledge about functions of proteins and small molecules is crucial for rationalization of the drug development process, and scientific publications are the main source of this knowledge. Protein knowledge networks capturing protein functions, protein-protein relations and organization of proteins in complex cellular sub-systems are making their way into modern drug discovery. Chemical networks representing multiple aspects of chemical functional information integrated into a protein systems biology network is even more advanced and promising paradigm. Areas covered in this review: This review describes utilization of literature-derived protein and chemical functional knowledge bases in drug development. What the reader will gain: Readers will gain an understanding of how integrated protein and chemical knowledge networks can be used for understanding and building the models of cellular events, disease mechanisms, and drug actions, finding biomarkers of drug efficacy and safety, as well as interpretation of high-throughput gene expression, proteomic and metabolomic experiments. Take home message: Integrated literature-derived protein and chemical knowledge bases can rationalize many aspects of drug development process including drug repositioning and biomarker design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据