4.6 Article

Delivery approaches for CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics in vivo: advances and challenges

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 905-913

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2018.1517746

关键词

CRISPR/Cas9; gene therapy; in vivo genome editing; therapeutic strategies; nonviral delivery; viral delivery; intracellular delivery

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB022641] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM008515, T32GM118289, R01GM077173] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB022641] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008515, R01 GM077173] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Therapeutic gene editing is becoming a viable biomedical tool with the emergence of the CRISPR/Cas9 system. CRISPR-based technologies have promise as a therapeutic platform for many human genetic diseases previously considered untreatable, providing a flexible approach to high-fidelity gene editing. For many diseases, such as sickle-cell disease and beta thalassemia, curative therapy may already be on the horizon, with CRISPR-based clinical trials slated for the next few years. Translation of CRISPR-based therapy to in vivo application however, is no small feat, and major hurdles remain for efficacious use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in clinical contexts. Areas covered: In this topical review, we highlight recent advances to in vivo delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system using various packaging formats, including viral, mRNA, plasmid, and protein-based approaches. We also discuss some of the barriers which have yet to be overcome for successful translation of this technology. Expert opinion: This review focuses on the challenges to efficacy for various delivery formats, with specific emphasis on overcoming these challenges through the development of carrier vehicles for transient approaches to CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据