4.6 Review

Elastin-like polypeptide for improved drug delivery for anticancer therapy: preclinical studies and future applications

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 653-667

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2015.974546

关键词

anticancer therapy; drug delivery; lastin-like polypeptide; thermally targeting

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IIP-1321375, CBET0931041]
  2. iCorp program of National Science Foundation [IIP-1264214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Despite their poor specificity, small molecule drugs are considered more powerful and effective than other current chemotherapies. A promising method for targeting these anticancer drugs to tumors, elastinlike polypeptides (ELP), has recently emerged. When an anticancer drug that has been conjugated to an ELP is administered, and focal hyperthermia applied, the thermoresponsive properties and enhanced permeability and retention effects of the ELP facilitate drug aggregation within tumor tissues. By incorporating a cell penetrating peptide onto this ELP-chemotherapeutic construct, even greater drug uptake into tumor cells can be achieved. Areas covered: The review explores the preclinical study progress of ELP-based drug delivery technology and discusses its potential in cancer therapy. Recent experimental work has shown that a delivery construct consisting of an ELP-therapeutic peptide (e.g., the c-Myc-inhibitory peptide, or the p21(WAF1/CIP1)-derived peptide), as well as ELP-small molecule drugs (e.g., doxorubicin, paclitaxel), can be thermally targeted to accumulate in tumors and diminish their growth. Expert opinion: ELP drug delivery technology is complementary and synergistic to current drug delivery modalities and based on existing hyperthermia technology. By using this technology to achieve chemotherapeutic targeting, efficacy can be improved and side effects reduced in comparison with current regimens, providing treatment alternatives and/or augmenting current therapies for cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据