4.6 Review

Mucoadhesive nanomedicines: characterization and modulation of mucoadhesion at the nanoscale

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 1085-1104

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2011.586334

关键词

cytoadhesion; mucosal surfaces; mucus; nanotechnology; polymeric nanoparticles

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, Portugal [SFRH/BD/43393/2008, SFRH/BPD/35996/2007]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/43393/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The benefits of mucoadhesive systems are related to the increased in situ residence and intimate contact of the delivery vehicle with the mucosa. The recent emergence of nanomedicine and the properties of nanoparticulate systems have created new challenges in understanding the nature and mechanisms of nanoscale mucoadhesion and in the development of methodologies for measuring its mucoadhesive potential. Even when usually regarded as an advantageous property, mucoadhesion can be an inconvenience for nanosystems, and strategies have been developed for minimizing interactions with the mucosal tissues/fluids. Areas covered: This article summarizes the basic concepts of mucoadhesion at the nanoscale, different techniques used for measuring the mucoadhesive potential of nanosystems and strategies for increasing/decreasing mucoadhesive interactions. Expert opinion: The mucoadhesion behavior of materials in bulk and at the nanoscale can significantly differ. Advances in the methodology used for studying the mucoadhesion phenomenon have contributed to its better understanding and, more importantly, the development of strategies to increase/decrease mucoadhesion. However, development of new methodologies for studying mucoadhesion at the nanoscale and the refinement of existing methodologies are still required. Also, a substantial amount of information is still lacking, particularly related to formulation issues, on how to translate lessons learnt at the bench top to the bed side.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据