4.3 Article

Isolation and characterization of the human immature osteoblast culture system from the alveolar bones of aged donors for bone regeneration therapy

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 1731-1744

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2014.960387

关键词

aging; bone morphogenic protein; bone regeneration; human immature osteoblast; NEBULETTE

资金

  1. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare through a Health Labour Sciences Research Grant for Comprehensive Research on Aging and Health
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293404, 26870678, 26670823] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Establishment of human osteoblast cultures that retain bone-forming capacity is one of the prerequisites for successful bone regeneration therapy. Because osteoblasts harvested from adults exhibit limited growth, the use of immature osteoblasts that can expand ex vivo should greatly facilitate bone regeneration therapy. In this study, we developed immature human osteoblasts isolated from aged alveolar bone (HAOBs). Methods: HAOBs obtained after the collagenase digestion of alveolar bones from elderly donors. Then, we assessed osteogenic ability of HAOB after treatment with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 or transplantation into immunodeficient mice. In addition, we performed global gene expression analysis to identify functional marker for HAOB. Results: HAOBs, which can differentiate into osteoblasts and have a robust bone-forming ability, were successfully extracted from donors who were > 60 years of age. We found that the HAOBs exhibited a higher osteogenic ability compared with those of human mesenchymal stem cells and highly expressed NEBULETTE (NEBL) with osteogenic abilities. Conclusions: HAOBs have properties similar to those of human immature osteoblasts and appear to be a novel material for cell-based bone regeneration therapy. Additionally, the expression level of NEBL may serve as a marker for the osteogenic ability of these cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据