4.3 Review

New biologic therapeutics for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 583-600

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2014.885945

关键词

adalimumab; anti-TNF drugs; certolizumab; Crohn's disease; golimumab; infliximab; natalizumab; remission; systematic review; ulcerative colitis

资金

  1. National Elite Foundation
  2. Iranian National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Some inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients especially those with refractory Crohn's disease (CD) or relapsing ulcerative colitis (UC) do not respond to current therapies. The newly introduced biological drugs have got some interest due to their specificity and selectivity in modulation of inflammatory elements. Areas covered: In 46 included randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, the efficacy and safety of different biologic drugs have been evaluated in moderately to severely active CD or UC patients. Current investigated drugs include new anti-TNF drugs (adalimumab, certolizunnab pegol, etanercept, onercept and golimumab), anti-CD20 (rituximab), T-cell inhibitors (abatacept) and anti-alpha 4 integrins (natalizumab and vedolizumab). Adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab showed significant efficacy in induction of remission and maintenance in CD and UC patients with a rate of adverse events similar to placebo in the major trials. Natalizumab and vedolizumab were effective in the treatment of moderately to severely active CD and UC patients. However, vedolizumab caused less adverse effects than natalizumab. onercept, etanercept, rituximab and abatacept were all well tolerated but were not effective in CD or UC patients. Expert opinion: Anti-TNF drugs, except for onercept and etanercept, and anti-alpha 4 integrins exhibit beneficial therapeutic effects. Although they were all well tolerated, the incidence of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy associated with natalizumab should not be missed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据