4.3 Review

The future potential for cocaine vaccines

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 1271-1283

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14712598.2014.920319

关键词

addiction; adjuvant; antibody; butyrylcholinesterase; cocaine; gene therapy; hydrolase; vaccine

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) [R01 DA030338, R01 DA025223, R01 DA023979, DP1 DA031340, R21 DA035591]
  2. Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Research Program
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Review Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Addiction to cocaine is a major problem around the world, but especially in developed countries where the combination of wealth and user demand has created terrible social problems. Although only some users become truly addicted, those who are often succumb to a downward spiral in their lives from which it is very difficult to escape. From the medical perspective, the lack of effective and safe, non-addictive therapeutics has instigated efforts to develop alternative approaches for treatment, including anticocaine vaccines designed to block cocaine's pharmacodynamic effects. Areas covered: This paper discusses the implications of cocaine pharmacokinetics for robust vaccine antibody responses, the results of human vaccine clinical trials, new developments in animal models for vaccine evaluation, alternative vaccine formulations and complementary therapy to enhance anticocaine effectiveness. Expert opinion: Robust anti-cocaine antibody responses are required for benefit to cocaine abusers, but since any reasonably achievable antibody level can be overcome with higher drug doses, sufficient motivation to discontinue use is also essential so that the relative barrier to cocaine effects will be appropriate for each individual. Combining a vaccine with achievable levels of an enzyme to hydrolyze cocaine to inactive metabolites, however, may substantially increase the blockade and improve treatment outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据