4.3 Review

Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase as a therapeutic target for heart failure

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 29-41

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14712590903321462

关键词

gene therapy; heart failure; sacroplasmic reticulum Ca2+; ATPase

资金

  1. American Heart Association (ARA) [0930116N]
  2. NIH [R01 HL078691, HL057263, HL071763, HL080498, HL083156]
  3. Leducq Foundation through the Caerus network [05 CVD 03]
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL057263, K01HL103176, R01HL078691, R01HL071763, R01HL088434, T32HL007824, R01HL080498, R01HL083156, R29HL057263] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cardiac isoform of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA2a) plays a major role in controlling excitation/contraction coupling. in both experimental and clinical heart failure, SERCA2a expression is significantly reduced which leads to abnormal Ca2+ handling and deficient contractility. A large number of studies in isolated cardiac myocytes and in small and large animal models of heart failure showed that restoring SERCA2a expression by gene transfer corrects the contractile abnormalities and improves energetics and electrical remodeling. Following a long line of investigation, a clinical trial is underway to restore SERCA2a expression in patients with heart failure using adeno-associated virus type 1. This review addresses the following issues regarding heart failure gene therapy: i) new insights on calcium regulation by SERCA2a; ii) SERCA2a as a gene therapy target in animal models of heart failure; iii) advances in the development of viral vectors and gene delivery; and iv) clinical trials on heart failure using SERCA2a. This review focuses on the new advances in SERCA2a- targeted gene therapy made in the last three years. In conclusion, SERCA2a is an important therapeutic target in various cardiovascular disorders. Ongoing clinical gene therapy trials will provide answers on its safety and applicability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据