4.6 Article

Experimental studies on heat transfer to Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids in helical coils with laminar and turbulent flow

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 792-804

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.09.024

关键词

Helical coil; Heat transfer; Newtonian fluid; Non-Newtonian fluid

资金

  1. University of Mumbai
  2. Lokmanya Tilak College of Engineering, Navi-Mumbai

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental studies on isothermal steady state and non-isothermal unsteady state conditions were carried out in helical coils for Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. Water, glycerol-water mixture as Newtonian fluids and dilute aqueous polymer solutions of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (SCMC), sodium alginate (SA) as non-Newtonian fluids were used in this study. These experiments were performed for coils with curvature ratios delta = 0.0757, 0.064 and 0.055 in laminar and turbulent regimes. An innovative approach of correlating Nusselt number to dimensionless number 'M' for Newtonian fluids based on experimental data is presented which is not available in the literature. Several correlations for the first time are proposed based on heat transfer data generated from the experiments performed for Newtonian fluids under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions (total 138 tests). These developed correlations were compared with the work of earlier investigators and were found in good agreement. Further, comparison of overall heat transfer coefficient U-o, and Nusselt numbers for Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions (total 276 tests) is presented in this paper. From the experimental results, it was found that overall heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt numbers for water are higher than glycerol-water mixture and non-Newtonian fluids. It was also observed from experimental results that as helix diameter increases, overall heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt numbers of both fluids decreases for the same flow rates. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据