4.6 Article

Experimental characterization of the effects of geometric parameters on evaporative pumping

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 183-188

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2013.07.013

关键词

Evaporative pumping; Phase change; Porous membrane

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) program [0966298]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study is interested in determining the experimental relation between the suction pressure and evaporation rate from the upper surface of a flat, thin porous membrane, which naturally draws water from a reservoir, and its microchannel feeding system. The effects of three main design parameters of a water delivery system on the evaporation rate of the membrane are considered: (i) the diameter of the microchannels irrigating the membrane, (ii) the length of the irrigating microchannels, and (iii) the surface area of the membrane. Additionally, we also evaluated the effect of the pumping height (i.e., the vertical distance between the membrane and the main reservoir) on the evaporation rates for the three design parameters. While the maximum evaporation rate from the membrane is a function of the membrane's properties (e.g., permeability and porosity), as well as the ambient conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure and humidity), this study focused on determining the geometric parameters of closed water-feeding microchannels that properly hydrate a porous membrane while not impeding evaporation. Results indicated that the evaporation rate was mostly unaffected by the channel dimensions considered. Moreover, evaporation rates increased with increasing surface area (between 20.3 cm(2) and 176.7 cm(2)) but at a decreasing rate of return. Finally, the suction pressures achieved were inversely related to hydrodynamic pressure drop and were unaffected by the membrane diameter. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据