4.6 Article

Impact of a liquid drop on a granular medium: Inertia, viscosity and surface tension effects on the drop deformation

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 43-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.03.007

关键词

Crater morphology; Drop impact; Granular media; Drop spreading

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental study of liquid drop impacts on a granular medium (glass beads) is proposed. Four fluids were used to vary physical properties: pure distilled water, water with glycerol at two concentrations 1:1 and 1:2 v/v and water with surfactant (Tween 20) at the concentration of 0.1 g l(-1) (approximate to 1 CMC). The drop free fall height was varied to obtain a Weber number (We) between 10 and 2000 and a Reynolds number (Re) between 100 and 13000. Different behaviors during the drop spreading, receding and absorption are highlighted as function of the fluids viscosity (mu) and surface tension (gamma). The role plays by the surfactant on the drop behavior after impact was found significant especially when the kinetic energy was high. On the other hand, the final diameter of the drop was found insensitive to the viscosity of the fluid and the Weber number. The maximal spreading factor beta(max) = D-max/D-0 was found to scale as We(1/4) for water + surfactant drops (gamma = 36 mJ m(-2), mu = 1 mPa s) whereas for the other fluids (gamma approximate to 70 mJ m(-2) but mu = 1 - 19 mPa s) beta(max) similar to We(1/5). The boundary between splashing and non-splashing was determined using the splash parameter K-d = We(1/2)Re(1/4). The threshold value K-ds was found higher that for impact of liquid drops on solid dry substrates. Experimental absorption times are also commented and compared with a simplified theoretical model. Finally, the morphology of the craters is discussed and a relationship between the crater diameter and the drop kinetic energy at impact is presented. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据