4.4 Article

Constraining Supersaturation and Transport Processes in a South American Cold-Air Outbreak Using Stable Isotopologues of Water Vapor

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
卷 72, 期 5, 页码 2055-2069

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0352.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. NSF-AGS Award [1158582]
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1158582] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In situ measurements of water vapor isotopic composition from the subtropical Chilean Andes, supported by mesoscale model simulations and diagnostic analyses, document the processes governing the transport of dry air and isotopically depleted water vapor from the midlatitudes into the subtropics during a South American cold-air surge in July 2014. On 23 July 2014, temperatures on the Chajnantor Plateau reached -18 degrees C, among the lowest temperatures on record for the site. On 26 July 2014, water vapor delta D and delta O-18 reached a low of -538 +/- 1.6 parts per thousand and -71.7 +/- 0.2 parts per thousand, among the lowest values on record. Numerical simulations show that the dynamics of the event were consistent with previous studies of South American cold-air outbreaks. Back-trajectory analyses show that the isotopically depleted water vapor that reached Chajnantor on July 26 was last saturated over the South Pacific on July 23 at 300 hPa at a temperature of about -50 degrees C under ice supersaturation with RHice of about 110%. The water vapor traveled to Chajnantor along a nearly isentropic path following saturation. Modeling of the isotopic data require condensation at temperatures between -50 degrees C and -53 degrees C under supersaturation with RHice between 112% and 118%, followed by less than 25% moistening during transport. These results show that measurements of water vapor isotopic composition can provide observational constraints on in-cloud processes that influence the humidity of the subtropics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据