4.3 Article

Endurance training decreases the non-linearity in the oxygen uptake-power output relationship in humans

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 3, 页码 386-399

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.062992

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Information, Poland [3PO5D08924]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we hypothesized that 5 weeks of cycling endurance training can decrease the magnitude of the non-proportional increase in oxygen uptake () to power output relationship (excess) at exercise intensities exceeding the lactate threshold (LT). Ten untrained, physically active men performed a bout of incremental cycling exercise until exhaustion before and after training. The mitochondrial DNA copy number, myosin heavy chain composition and content of uncoupling protein 3 and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPases (SERCAs) were analysed in muscle biopsies taken from vastus lateralis before and after training. The training resulted in an enhancement of the power-generating capabilities at maximal oxygen uptake () by similar to 7% (P= 0.002) despite there being no changes in (P= 0.49). This effect was due to a considerable reduction in the magnitude of the excess (P < 0.05) above the LT. A decrease in plasma ammonia concentration was found during exercise after training (P < 0.05). A downregulation of SERCA2 in vastus lateralis (P= 0.006) was observed after training. No changes in myosin heavy chain composition, selected electron transport chain proteins, uncoupling protein 3 or the mitochondrial DNA copy number (P > 0.05) were found after training. We conclude that the training-induced increase in power-generating capabilities at was due to attenuation of the excess above the LT. This adaptive response seems to be related to the improvement of muscle metabolic stability, as judged by a lowering of plasma ammonia concentration. The enhancement of muscle metabolic stability after training could be caused by a decrease in ATP usage at a given power output owing to downregulation of SERCA2 pumps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据