4.2 Article

Trichinella spiralis: Infection reduces airway allergic inflammation in mice

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL PARASITOLOGY
卷 127, 期 2, 页码 539-544

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.10.004

关键词

Trichinella spiralis; Allergic airway inflammation; IL-10; TGF-beta; CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cell

资金

  1. Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an effort to define the mechanism underlying the host immune downregulation inherent to Trichinella spiralis infection, we compared the levels of Th1, Th2, and regulatory cytokines and CD4(+)CD25(+) forkhead box P3 (FoxP3)(+) T (T-reg) cell recruitment, as well as cellular pathology in the airway between T. spiralis infected and uninfected asthma-induced mice. After the induction of allergic airway inflammation, we noted influxes of inflammatory cells into the peribronchial tree. However, in the T. spiralis infection groups, cellular infiltration was minimal around the bronchial tree, with only a smattering of inflammatory cells. In the OVA-challenged group after T. spiralis infection, the numbers of macrophages and eosinophils in the bronchial alveolar lavage fluid were reduced by 23% and 52%, respectively, as compared to those of the OVA-challenged group. Airway hyperresponsiveness of OVA-challenged mice after T. spiralis infection was significantly suppressed as compared to the OVA-only challenged mice. The T. spiralis-infected mice exhibited a significant reduction in IL-5 concentrations relative to that noted in the OVA-challenged group (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, the regulatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-beta levels were increased significantly as the result of T. spiralis infection, and we verified the recruitment of T-reg cells in lung draining lymph nodes via T. spiralis infection. Therefore, T-reg cells, which were recruited by T. spiralis infection, might ameliorate lung function and reduce allergic airway inflammation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据