4.7 Article

PI3K mediated electrotaxis of embryonic and adult neural progenitor cells in the presence of growth factors

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 227, 期 1, 页码 210-217

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.11.002

关键词

Neural progenitor cells; Electric field; Cell migration; PI3K; Akt; Growth factors

资金

  1. Royal Society [UF051616, UF090098 UK]
  2. European Research Council [243261]
  3. Alban studentship [E07D400602UY]
  4. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine [RB1-01417]
  5. NIH [1R01EY019101]
  6. NSF [MCB-0951199]
  7. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY019101] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Correct guidance of the migration of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) is essential for the development and repair of the central nervous system (CNS). Electric field (EF)-guided migration, electrotaxis, has been observed in many cell types. We report here that, in applied EFs of physiological magnitude, embryonic and adult NPCs show marked electrotaxis, which is dependent on the PI3K/Akt pathway. The electrotaxis was also evidenced by ex vivo investigation that transplanted NPCs migrated directionally towards cathode in organotypic spinal cord slice model when treated with EFs. Genetic disruption or pharmacological inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) impaired electrotaxis, whereas EF exposure increased Akt phosphorylation in a growth factor-dependent manner and increased phosphatidylinosito1-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) levels. EF treatments also induced asymmetric redistribution of PIP3, growth factor receptors, and actin cytoskeleton. Electrotaxis in both embryonic and adult NPCs requires epidermal growth factor (EGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF). Our results demonstrate the importance of the PI3K/Akt pathway in directed migration of NPCs driven by EFs and growth factors and highlight the potential of EFs to enhance the guidance of various NPC populations in CNS repair therapies. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据