4.7 Article

Electroconvulsive seizure-induced VEGF is correlated with neuroprotective effects against cerebral infarction: Involvement of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt pathway

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 225, 期 2, 页码 377-383

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.07.010

关键词

Cerebral ischemia; Electrical convulsive stimulation; Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); PI3K/Akt pathway; Neuroprotection

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study demonstrates the cytoprotective effect of electrical convulsive stimulation (ECS) as a potential neuroprotective vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inducer against ischemic insult. Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt (PI3K/Akt) is thought to be an important factor that mediates neuroprotection. However, the signaling pathways in the brain in vivo after ECS remain unclear. We measured and compared infarction volumes to investigate the effect of ECS on cerebral infarction induced by permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. We evaluated the effects of pretreatment with Wortmannin (Wort), a specific PI3K inhibitor of ECS-induced neuroprotection against infarction volumes. To clarify the relationship between PI3K/Akt activation and neuroprotection, we used immunoblot analysis to determine the amounts of p-Akt and VEGF proteins present after ECS with or without Wort treatment. Neuroprotective effects of ECS (pretreatment with a single ECS 6 h before ischemia) were prevented by Wort pretreatment, which indicates that the PI3K/Akt pathway may mediate ECS-dependent protection. ECS induced p-Akt and VEGF and ECS pretreatment enhanced ischemia-induced VEGF, both of which were prevented by Wort pretreatment. These results suggest that a single ECS induces p-Akt and that ECS plays an important role in neuroprotection against the cerebral ischemia through VEGF induction. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据