4.7 Article

Calcium dysregulation induces apoptosis-inducing factor release: Cross-talk between PARP-1-and calpain- signaling pathways

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 218, 期 2, 页码 213-220

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.04.032

关键词

NMDA toxicity; Calpain; PARP-1; Apoptosis-inducing factor; Ischemia; Mitochondria; Calcium homeostasis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/NINDS [NS43802, NS45048, NS36736, NS 56118, NS38118, NS48216]
  2. NIH NRSA [1F30NS057886]
  3. Chinese Natural Science Foundation [30470592, 30670642]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent discoveries show that caspase-independent cell death pathways are a pervasive mechanism in neurodegenerative diseases, and apoprosis-inducing factor (AIF) is an important effector of this mode of neuronal death. There are currently two known mechanisms underlying AIF release following excitotoxic stress, PARP-1 and calpain. To test whether there is an interaction between PARP-1 and calpain in triggering AIF release, we used the NMDA toxicity model in rat primary cortical neurons. Exposure to NMIDA resulted in AIF truncation and nuclear translocation, and shRNA-mediated knockdown of AIF resulted in neuroprotection. Both calpain and PARM are involved with AIF processing as AIF truncation, nuclear translocation and neuronal death were attenuated by calpain inhibition using adeno-associated virus-mediated overexpression of the endogenous calpain inhibitor, calpastatin, or treatment with the PARP-1 inhibitor 3-ABA. Activation of PARP-1 is necessary for calpain activation as PARP-1 inhibition blocked mitochondrial calpain activation. Finally, NMDA toxicity induces mitochondrial Ca2+ dysregulation in a PARP-1 dependent manner. Thus, PARP-1 and mitochondrial calpain activation are linked via PARP-1-induced alterations in mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis. Collectively, these findings link the two seemingly independent mechanisms triggering AIF-induced neuronal death. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据