4.5 Article

In-Situ Mechanical Testing for Characterizing Strain Localization During Deformation at Elevated Temperatures

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS
卷 52, 期 4, 页码 405-416

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-011-9499-7

关键词

Elevated temperature tension experiment; Scanning electron microscopy; 2D digital image correlation; Speckle pattern development; Nickel-based superalloy

资金

  1. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) [FA9550-09-1-0014]
  2. Materials & Manufacturing Directorate of the Air Force Research Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental methodology has been developed to characterize local strain heterogeneities in alloys via in-situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) based mechanical testing. Quantitative measurements of local strains as a function of grain orientation, morphology and neighborhood are crucial for mechanistic understanding and validation of crystal plasticity models. This study focuses on the technical challenges associated with performing creep tests at elevated temperatures <= 700 degrees C in an SEM. Samples of nickel-based superalloy Rene 104 were used for this study, but the technique is applicable to testing of any metal samples at elevated temperature. Electron beam lithography was employed to produce a suitable surface speckle pattern of hafnium oxide to facilitate full field displacement measurements using a commercial software package. The speckle pattern proved to have good thermal stability and provided excellent contrast for image acquisition using secondary electron imaging at elevated temperature. The speckle pattern and microscope magnification were optimized to obtain the resolution necessary to discern strain localizations within grain interiors and along grain boundaries. Minimum strain resolution due to SEM image distortions was determined prior to tensile testing, and image integration methods were utilized to minimize imaging artifacts. Limitations due to the present specimen heating method and potential solutions to these limitations are also addressed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据