4.6 Article

A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 110, 期 509, 页码 195-204

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2014.893884

关键词

Abundance estimation; Acoustic survey; Closed population; Measurement error; Visual survey

资金

  1. National Geographic Society/Waitt Grants Program [W184-11]
  2. Fundacao Nacional para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal (FCT) [PEst OE/MAT/UI0006/2011]
  3. EPSRC [EP/I000917/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/I000917/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fundamental problem in wildlife ecology and management is estimation of population size or density. The two dominant methods in this area are capture-recapture (CR) and distance sampling (DS), each with its own largely separate literature. We develop a class of models that synthesizes them. It accommodates a spectrum of models ranging from nonspatial CR models (with no information on animal locations) through to DS and mark-recapture distance sampling (MRDS) models, in which animal locations are observed without error. Between these lie spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) models that include only capture locations, and a variety of models with less location data than are typical of DS surveys but more than are normally used on SECR surveys. In addition to unifying CR and DS models, the class provides a means of improving inference from SECR models by adding supplementary location data, and a means of incorporating measurement error into DS and MRDS models. We illustrate their utility by comparing inference on acoustic surveys of gibbons and frogs using only capture locations, using estimated angles (gibbons) and combinations of received signal strength and time-of-arrival data (frogs), and on a visual MRDS survey of whales, comparing estimates with exact and estimated distances. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据