4.1 Article

Interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α act synergistically to up-regulate tissue factor in alveolar epithelial cells

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL LUNG RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 509-517

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/01902148.2011.605512

关键词

acute lung injury; acute respiratory distress syndrome; coagulation; microparticles; TNFR1; TNFR2; tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor

资金

  1. NIH/NICHD [5 K12 HD 043483-05, HL090785]
  2. NIH [HL103836, HL088263]
  3. American Heart Association
  4. NIHLBI [T32 HL087738]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fibrin deposition mediated through activation of tissue factor (TF) in the airspace is central to the pathogenesis of acute lung injury. Defining the mechanisms of TF regulation in the lung is critical to understanding pulmonary fibrin formation. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) up-regulates TF in the injured lung, and there is emerging evidence that another cytokine, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), also modulates expression. The effects of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma on regulation of TF were studied in alveolar epithelial A549 cells. In addition, potential mechanisms of modulation of TF expression by the 2 cytokines were analyzed with the hypothesis that IFN-gamma acts synergistically with TNF-alpha to up-regulate alveolar epithelial TF through modulation of TNF receptor (TNFR) expression. TNF-alpha but not IFN-gamma treatment increased TF mRNA, protein, and cell surface TF activity. The combination of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha treatment augmented the effects of TNF-alpha on TF up-regulation and also increased release of procoagulant microparticles (MPs) from A549 cells. IFN-gamma modulated expression of both TNF-alpha receptors. Studies utilizing neutralizing antibodies against the two TNF receptors showed that the TF effects were mediated primarily through augmentation of TNFR1-dependent cellular responses. These findings have important implications for regulation of fibrin formation in the lung in the setting of acute inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据