4.5 Article

Leucocyte telomere length is no molecular marker of physical frailty in late-life depression

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 229-234

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.07.016

关键词

Telomere length; Frailty; Depressive disorder; Aged

资金

  1. ZonMW VICI grant
  2. Fonds NutsOhra
  3. Stichting tot Steun VCVGZ
  4. NARSAD
  5. Brain and Behaviour Research Fund
  6. VU University Medical Center
  7. Leiden University Medical Center
  8. University Medical Center Groningen
  9. University Medical Center St Radboud
  10. GGZinGeest
  11. GGNet
  12. GGZ Nijmegen
  13. Parnassia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Although average life-expectancy is still increasing worldwide, ageing processes markedly differ between individuals, which has stimulated the search for biomarkers of biological ageing. Objectives: Firstly, to explore the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between leucocyte telomere length (LTL) as molecular marker of ageing and the physical frailty phenotype (PFP) as a clinical marker of ageing and secondly, to examine whether these associations are moderated by the presence of a depressive disorder, as depression can be considered a condition of accelerated ageing. Methods: Among 378 depressed older patients (according to DSM-IV criteria) and 132 non-depressed older persons participating in the Netherlands Study of Depression in Older persons, we have assessed the physical frailty phenotype and LTL. The PFP was defined according to Fried's criteria and its components were reassessed at two-year follow-up. Results: LTL was neither associated with the PFP at baseline by Spearman rank correlation tests, nor did it predict change in frailty parameters over a two-year follow-up using regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders. Conclusion: LTL is not associated with frailty; neither in non-depressed nor in depressed older persons. As LTL and physical frailty appear to represent different aspects of ageing, they may complement each other in future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据