4.5 Review

Gender and telomere length: Systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 15-27

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.12.004

关键词

Gender; Telomere length; Systematic review and meta-analysis; Measurement methods; Epidemiology

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, N01-HC-95169]
  2. NCRR [UL1-RR-024156, UL1-RR-025005]
  3. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [HL80698, HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268200800007C, N01HC55222, N01HC85079, N01HC85080, N01HC85081, N01HC85082, N01HC85083, N01HC85086, HL080295]
  4. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
  5. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [AG023629]
  6. National R & D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [0720550-2]
  7. BBSRC [BB/F019394/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. ESRC [ES/G00773X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. MRC [G0500997, MR/K023209/1, MC_UP_A620_1015, G0700704, MC_UU_12017/5, MC_UU_12011/2, MC_UP_A540_1021, MR/K007017/1, MC_UU_12017/7] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F019394/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Chief Scientist Office [SPHSU2, CZB/4/505, ETM/55] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/G00773X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Kidney Research UK [RP34/2009] Funding Source: researchfish
  14. Medical Research Council [U1475000001, MC_UU_12017/5, MC_UP_A620_1015, MC_UU_12017/7, MR/K007017/1, MC_UU_12011/2, G0500997, MC_PC_13040, MC_UP_A620_1014, MR/K023209/1, MC_UP_A540_1021, MC_U147585824, MR/K026992/1, U1475000002, MC_UU_12011/1, G0700704] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0513-10085, NF-SI-0508-10082] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Korea Health Promotion Institute [0720550-1, A119998] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It is widely believed that females have longer telomeres than males, although results from studies have been contradictory. Methods: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analyses to test the hypothesis that in humans, females have longer telomeres than males and that this association becomes stronger with increasing age. Searches were conducted in EMBASE and MEDLINE (by November 2009) and additional datasets were obtained from study investigators. Eligible observational studies measured telomeres for both females and males of any age, had a minimum sample size of 100 and included participants not part of a diseased group. We calculated summary estimates using random-effects meta-analyses. Heterogeneity between studies was investigated using sub-group analysis and meta-regression. Results: Meta-analyses from 36 cohorts (36,230 participants) showed that on average females had longer telomeres than males (standardised difference in telomere length between females and males 0.090, 95% CI 0.015, 0.166; age-adjusted). There was little evidence that these associations varied by age group (p = 1.00) or cell type (p = 0.29). However, the size of this difference did vary by measurement methods, with only Southern blot but neither real-time PCR nor Flow-FISH showing a significant difference. This difference was not associated with random measurement error. Conclusions: Telomere length is longer in females thanmales, although this difference was not universally found in studies that did not use Southern blot methods. Further research on explanations for the methodological differences is required. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据